Climate change denial makes this polar bear sad.
A list of the dumbest things ever said about global warming is,
sadly, almost impossible to curate in any comprehensive fashion.
Politicians, talk show hosts, economists, pundits – people are saying
dumb things about climate change
all the time. But after much exhaustive research, we narrowed it down to 10 prize-winningly idiotic statements on this subject.
1. Carbon dioxide "literally cannot cause global warming."
People have tried to deny climate science in a lot of ways, but it's
hard to beat a complete rejection of well-established atmospheric
physics. Joe Bastardi, a meteorologist appearing on Fox News, argued
that CO2 "literally" cannot cause warming because it doesn't "mix well
in the atmosphere" (it does). He's also claimed that warming would
violate the First Law of Thermodynamics, which states that energy can
neither be created nor destroyed. (In fact, global warming has nothing
to do with newly created energy, but with the atmosphere trapping energy
that's already around.)
2. "Snow skiing will be hurt – but water skiing will benefit."
In 1990, as the world was beginning to grapple with the devastating
predictions of climate models, a Yale economist set out to determine how
much was a reasonable amount to spend on combating the problem. Not
that much, he concluded, since "Humans thrive in a wide variety of
climate zones. Cities are increasingly climate-proofed by technological
changes like air-conditioning and shopping malls." Further, he argued,
the hardest-hit sectors – like, say, agriculture – are relatively small
parts of the economy anyway. And economic growth in other sectors could
compensate: "Snow skiing will be hurt – but water skiing will benefit."
How reassuring!
RS contributor Bill McKibben lambasted this analysis in his 2007 book,
Deep Economy.
"It's nice to have microelectronics; it's necessary to have lunch,"
wrote McKibben. "If global warming 'only' damages agriculture, the rest
may not matter much."
3. "We must demand that more coal be burned to save the Earth from global cooling."
The "global cooling" myth is another favorite of climate deniers,
despite broad scientific consensus that the planet is in fact warming.
But it's got to be an especially appealing fiction when you're the CEO
of a coal company – this statement is from a tweet by Don Blankenship,
then the head of Massey Energy.
4. Climate change is impossible because "God's still up there."
In 2012, U.S. Sen. James Inhofe (R-Oklahoma) contended that
acceptance of climate science was at odds with Christianity – never mind
that many Christian leaders and institutions take climate change very
seriously. "My point is, God's still up there," he told Voice of
Christian Youth America. "The arrogance of people to think that we,
human beings, would be able to change what He is doing in the climate is
to me outrageous."
A close runner-up in this category: In 2009, Rep. John Shimkus
(R-Illinois) cited God's post-flood promise to Noah as evidence we
shouldn't be worried. "The Earth will end only when God declares it's
time to be over," he declared. "Man will not destroy this Earth." Well,
that must be nice to know.
5. God buried fossil fuels "because he loves to see us find them."
Bryan Fischer, a director at the American Family Association,
compared efforts to burn less fossil fuels to telling a friend that you
don't like their birthday present. "That's kind of how we're treating
God when he's given us these gifts of abundant and inexpensive and
effective fuel sources," he observed. "God has buried those treasures
there because he loves to see us find them." And everyone knows it's bad
manners to turn down a divine treasure hunt.
6. "The President was wearing a trench coat it was so cold, but he's talking about global warming."
This gem, from U.S. Rep. Steve Scalise (R-Louisiana) in reference to
President Obama's 2013 inauguration speech, is part of a long, confused
tradition: The conviction that anecdotally observed cold weather of any
kind debunks the science of climate change. See also the igloo that
James Inhofe's family built on the National Mall (they called it "Al
Gore's new home") or the ad from the Virginia Republican Party, aired
before the same snowstorm, advising voters to call legislators who
supported climate actions and "tell them how much global warming you get
this weekend. Maybe they'll come help you shovel." With probably
thousands of articles out there now explaining the simple fact that
weather is not the same thing as climate, this joke gets dumber every time it's made.
7. "I thought it must be true until I found out what it cost."
Yes, Sen. Inhofe gets two entries. Speaking to Rachel Maddow in 2012,
he admitted that his rejection of climate science began with realizing
how expensive mitigation would be. Not only is it flatly nonsensical to
deny that a problem exists because you don't like its cure, delaying
climate action is actually the
more expensive course. The
International Energy Agency has estimated that for every year the world
delays taking significant action to curb climate change, we'll end up
paying an additional $500 billion later on.
8. Safeguarding the climate is "a worldview that elevates the Earth above man."
Rick Santorum was a front-runner for the GOP presidential nomination
when he called climate science a "phony theology" – "a worldview that
elevates the Earth above man and says that we can't take those resources
because we're going to harm the Earth." (Santorum has also said, "We
were put on this Earth as creatures of God to have dominion over the
Earth, to use it wisely and steward it wisely, but for our benefit not
for the Earth's benefit.") This people-vs.-planet idea is another common
refrain from climate skeptics. They rarely seem to have considered the
fairly obvious point that functioning human society depends on a healthy
planet.
9. "100 years is a long time . . . There is
an extremely high chance that the very nature of human society itself
will have changed by that time in ways that render this entire issue
moot."
This novel bit of reasoning is from an essay called "
In Praise of Dirty Energy: There Are Worse Things Than Pollution and We Have Them," by economist and blogger Karl W. Smith, now a writer for
Forbes.
Smith accepts the science of climate change – but argues that we should
burn more fossil fuels anyway, in order to spur economic growth. As the
climate changes, he believes that people will simply build new cities
or move north to Siberia, and build a society so technologically
advanced it's somehow progressed beyond the need for a stable climate.
Piece of cake!
10. "I have a theory about global warming
and why people think it's real. Go back 30, 40 years when there was much
less air conditioning in the country. When you didn't have air
conditioning and you left the house, it may in fact have gotten a little
cooler out there, because sometimes houses become hot boxes. Especially
if you're on the second or third floor of a house in the summer time
and all you've got is open windows and maybe a window fan. Or you have
some servant standing there fanning you with a piece of paper. When you
walked outside, no big deal, it's still hot as hell. Now, 30, 40 years
later, all this air conditioning, and it's a huge difference when you go
outside. When you go outside now, my golly, is it hot. Oh. Global
warming. It's all about the baseline you're using for comparison."
Oh, OK: All those scientists who have confirmed a pattern of
long-term climate change were just getting confused by their air
conditioning. Right. Thanks, Rush Limbaugh, for the low-hanging fruit.
No comments:
Post a Comment