 July 9, 2012 at 12:29:33
By Robert Parry (about the author)
July 9, 2012 at 12:29:33
By Robert Parry (about the author)
 A
 "derecho," a pattern of thunderstorms racing in a straight line, is 
more common in the American Plains, but one struck the Washington area 
on June 29, 2012. (Photo credit: U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric 
Administration)
A
 "derecho," a pattern of thunderstorms racing in a straight line, is 
more common in the American Plains, but one struck the Washington area 
on June 29, 2012. (Photo credit: U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric 
Administration)
 
Something called a "derecho" -- a fast-moving line of thunderstorms -- 
strikes the Washington area, knocking out power for days. Massive forest 
fires ravage Colorado. A record heat wave covers much of the country. 
The U.S. press treats these events as major stories, but two words are 
rarely mentioned: "global warming."
What has become most striking about the growing evidence that climate
 change is a clear and present danger -- indeed an emerging existential 
threat -- is the simultaneous failure of the U.S. news media to deal 
seriously with the issue, another sign of how the Right can intimidate 
the mainstream into going silent.
 We have seen this pattern before, as the Right sets the media agenda 
by bullying those who threaten its ideological interests. Before the 
Iraq War, anyone who dared raise questions about the Bush 
administration's justifications could expect to be marginalized or 
worse. Just ask Phil Donahue, Scott Ritter and the Dixie Chicks.
During Ronald Reagan's presidency, his hard-nosed propagandists 
dubbed this tactic "controversializing," that is, anyone who got too 
much in the way could expect to be subjected to systematic smears and 
professional deconstruction. With so many right-wing voices willing to 
say almost anything, it wasn't hard to intimidate people.
The smart career play was always to retreat when these forces were 
arrayed against you. Why risk your six- or seven-figure salary on some 
issue when there are so many other stories that you can work on without 
all the grief?
Indeed, those journalists who wouldn't be scared off could easily be 
discredited as "causists," or people "with an agenda," i.e., they'd be 
painted as "unprofessional." So, under this view of "journalism," it's 
much more "professional" to treat the recent weather events arising from
 this over-heating planet as unfathomable "acts of God."
And that's exactly what we've seen. Though there are exceptions here 
and there, generally these heat-related weather anomalies have been 
handled like earthquakes, something that couldn't be expected or 
stopped. There have been loads of human-interest stories about people 
coping or suffering but almost no larger context.
Phenomenon of Silence
This phenomenon of silence -- both in the political and journalistic 
realms -- has not gone completely unnoticed. It's just that those who 
make the point are ignored, too.
For instance, Sen. John Kerry, D-Massachusetts, gave a major speech
 on the Senate floor on June 19 lamenting the failure of the U.S. 
political system to address the global-warming crisis but the speech got
 little play.
Kerry said...
"As a matter of conscience and common sense, we should be
 compelled to fight today's insidious conspiracy of silence on climate 
change -- a silence that empowers misinformation and mythology to grow 
where science and truth should prevail. It is a conspiracy that has not 
just stalled, but demonized any constructive effort to put America in a 
position to lead the world on this issue. ...
"In the United States, a calculated campaign of disinformation has 
steadily beaten back the consensus momentum for action on climate change
 and replaced it with timidity by proponents in the face of millions of 
dollars of phony, contrived 'talking points,' illogical and wholly 
unscientific propositions and a general scorn for the truth wrapped in 
false threats about job loss and taxes.
"Yet today, the naysayers escape all accountability to the truth. The
 media hardly murmurs when a candidate for President of the United 
States in 2012 [a reference to Mitt Romney] can walk away from 
previously held positions to announce that the evidence is not yet there
 about the impact of greenhouse gases on climate.
"The truth is, scientists have known since the 1800s that carbon 
dioxide and other greenhouse gases trap heat in our atmosphere. With the
 right amount of these gases, the Earth is a hospitable place for us to 
live. But if you add too much, which is what we're doing right now, at a
 record pace, temperatures inevitably rise to record-setting levels. 
It's not rocket science.
"Every major national science academy in the world has reported that 
global warming is real. ... Facts that beg for an unprecedented public 
response are met with unsubstantiated, even totally contradicted denial.
 And those who deny have never, ever met their de minimus responsibility
 to provide some scientific answer to what, if not human behavior, is 
causing the increase in greenhouse gas particulates and how, if not by 
curbing greenhouse gases, we will address this crisis."
Endless Dissembling
Kerry continued...
"The level of dissembling -- of outright falsifying 
of information, of greedy appeal to fear tactics that has stalled 
meaningful action now for 20 years -- is hard to wrap one's mind around. 
It is so far removed from legitimate analysis that it confounds for its 
devilishly simple appeal to the lowest common denominator of 
disinformation.
"In the face of a massive and growing body of scientific evidence 
that says catastrophic climate change is knocking at our door, the 
naysayers just happily tell us climate change doesn't exist. In the face
 of melting glaciers and ice caps in the Arctic, Greenland and 
Antarctica, they say we need to 'warm up to the truth.' And in the face 
of animals disappearing at alarming rates, they would have us adopt an 
'ostrich' policy and simply bury our heads in the sand. ...
"Al Gore spoke of the 'assault on reason.' Well, Exhibit A is staring
 us in the face: Coalitions of politicians and special interests that 
peddle science fiction over science fact. A paid-for, multi-million 
dollar effort that twists and turns the evidence until it's gnarled 
beyond recognition.
"And tidal waves of cash that back a status quo of recklessness and 
inaction over responsibility and change. In short, it's a story of 
disgraceful denial, back-pedaling and delay that has brought us 
perilously close to a climate change catastrophe. ...
"What's worse, we've stood by and let it all happen -- we've treated 
falsehood with complacence and allowed a conspiracy of silence on 
climate change to infiltrate our politics. ...
"The conspiracy of silence that now characterizes Washington's 
handling of the climate issue is dangerous. Climate change is one of two
 or three of the most serious threats our country now faces, if not the 
most serious, and the silence that has enveloped a once robust debate is
 staggering for its irresponsibility.
"The costs of inaction get more and more expensive the longer we 
wait -- and the longer we wait, the less likely we are to avoid the worst 
and leave future generations with a sustainable planet."
So what was the reaction to Kerry's address? It got some notice on 
blogs, especially those dedicated to climate-change issues, but received
 almost no attention from the mainstream news media.
Ten days after Kerry's speech, the Washington area was struck by a 
"derecho," a weather event virtually unknown to the people of the 
region. This straight line of fierce thunderstorms uprooted trees and 
knocked down power lines leaving much of the sweltering capital area in 
the dark and without air conditioning.
The devastation -- along with forest fires in Colorado and 100-degree 
heat over much of the country -- got lots of attention from the news 
media. But there was almost no discussion of the why.
Granted, no specific weather event can be traced directly to global 
warming, but climate scientists have been saying for years that the 
gradual increase in temperatures will be accompanied by more and more 
extreme weather patterns, exactly what the United States and much of the
 world are experiencing.
Yet, just as the U.S. news media failed the country in 2003 by caving
 to the Right's pressure on the Iraq invasion, American journalism is 
now failing future generations by cowering in front of the loud voices 
of powerful climate-change deniers.
http://www.consortiumnews.com
Robert Parry broke many of the Iran-Contra stories in the 1980s for the Associated Press and Newsweek. His latest book, 
Secrecy & Privilege: Rise of the Bush Dynasty from Watergate to Iraq, can be ordered at 
more...)
 
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
 
No comments:
Post a Comment